Top 10 Concord Alternative: A Complete Guide

September 29, 2025

5 min read

Concord is a well-known contract lifecycle management tool used by many businesses to streamline contract creation, negotiation, signature, and renewals. But no single tool is ideal for every organisation.

✨

Quick Read

Summary generated by AI, reviewed for accuracy.

In this article, we explore why one might need alternatives to Concord, what Concord offers, its pros and cons, and then present 10 top competitors / alternatives. We’ll also cover best practices for choosing among them and address some common FAQs.

Situations change, requirements evolve, budgets shift, or integration needs become more complex.

That leads many companies to look for Concord alternatives that provide similar or better functionality, improved usability, better pricing, or specialized capabilities.

Why Look for Concord Alternatives?

Concord is a CLM software that offers end-to-end contract lifecycle management. Its core capabilities include contract authoring/creation, negotiation, collaborative editing, approvals, eSignature, a centralized repository, version control, reminders and renewal management, analytics, and team collaboration.

Pros

Here are strengths of Concord, things that many users like and that tend to make it an effective solution for many organisations:

End-to-end lifecycle coverage — Concord handles authoring, negotiation, execution, renewal, etc., within one platform.
Built-in eSignature & negotiation — Reduces tool sprawl since signature / negotiation can be handled inside.
User experience & adoption — Generally intuitive UI, so legal/non-legal teams (sales, procurement) can use it without heavy training.
Centralised repository & visibility — One place for all contracts plus reminders, alerts etc.
Version control & audit trails — Important for compliance and legal risk management.
Collaboration tools — Sharing, commenting, tracking changes, etc.

There are several reasons businesses might consider alternatives for Concord.

Changing business needs: As companies grow, their contract volume, complexity, compliance/regulatory requirements, or cross-departmental usage may increase.
Integration & ecosystem fit: Perhaps Concord lacks seamless integration with certain internal tools or ERP/CRM systems, or you prefer certain tech stacks. Some businesses might prefer integration with existing system.
Security, compliance, legal/regulatory constraints: Some industries need specific security or compliance standards (e.g. audit trails, data residency, complex permissions).

10 Best Concord Alternatives & Competitors

We’ve curated a list of the top 10 Concord alternatives and competitors for 2025. Each of these platforms brings unique strengths, from advanced automation and AI-driven insights to cost-effective plans and robust compliance features, helping you find the perfect fit for your business needs.

1) CLM 365

CLM 365 is a CLM solution built directly on the Microsoft 365 ecosystem and it integrates with SharePoint, MS Teams, Outlook, MS Copilot, Power BI. It is designed for organisations already using Microsoft tools, enabling tight integration and leveraging existing infrastructure. It offers a user-friendly approach, with customizable workflows, AI powered contract lifecycle management, and centralised management.

Key Features

AI Powered System
Contract compliance
Redlining using MS Word
Alternative clause suggestions
Contract creation from Outlook
Advanced security protocols
Role based access
Smart obligation management
Audit trials
Safe contract routing
Contract negotiation
Contract amendments
Secure signing options
Reporting & Analytics

Why Choose CLM 365 as a Concord Alternative

CLM 365 delivers powerful contract management without the extra “AI tax.” It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools like Teams and SharePoint, making adoption easy for your teams. Its robust security and keeps data safe, and its intuitive interface allows legal, sales, and procurement teams to manage all contracts in one centralized, easy-to-use platform.

Ratings

G2:  4.8 

Capterra: 4.8 

Microsoft AppSource: 4.9 (79 reviews)

Pricing: Price starts at $29.99

2) Ironclad

Ironclad is a robust enterprise-grade contract lifecycle management platform. It emphasises automation, analytics, workflow customization, and collaboration. Many large legal / operations teams use Ironclad when they need strong scalability, detailed workflows, and insightful dashboards.Key Features

Contract creation & templates.
Contract editing
Contract versioning
Contract collaboration
Approval process control
Customizable workflows.
Notifications & reminders for deadlines
Centralised contract database
E-Signature
Reporting & dashboards.

Why Choose Ironclad as Concord Alternative

For more advanced workflow customization and automation. If Concord lacks certain complex routing or governance features, Ironclad often performs better. Good option if you can invest more in setup, training, and you want maturity.

Ratings

G2: 4.5
Capterra: 4.4

3) Icertis

Icertis is one of the most powerful CLM platforms available, particularly well-suited for large enterprises. It offers advanced contract insights, supports global deployments, accommodates multiple languages and jurisdictions, provides contract compliance management, and efficiently handles extensive contract portfolios.

Key Features

Agreement signing options
Clause risk analysis.
Global / multilingual support
Compliance management
Contract repository
Centralized platform to handle agreements
Integrations with major enterprise systems (CRM, ERP etc.).
Workflow automation
Contract negotiations

Why Choose Icertis as Concord Alternative

If your organisation requires global scope, large contract volumes, heavy governance and regulatory oversight. If you value deeper contract intelligence and risk management capabilities beyond basic authoring/signature.

Ratings

G2: 4.2
Capterra: 4.4

4) Zoho Contracts

Zoho Contracts is part of the Zoho ecosystem, providing an easy-to-use, feature-rich CLM solution. It’s ideal for small- to mid-sized businesses or teams already using Zoho apps. The platform covers the entire contract lifecycle, including contract authoring, negotiation, obligation tracking, and reporting, while keeping costs low and usability high.

Key Features

Built-in document editor
Approval workflows
Electronic signature via Zoho Sign
Obligation management
Dashboard and reporting features
Contract templates
Contract performance and track milestones
Central contract repository
Audit trail,
Version history
Integration with Zoho’s suite

Why Choose Zoho Contracts as Concord Alternative

Zoho Contracts offers excellent value for money, particularly for businesses already using the Zoho ecosystem. It is well-suited for managing post-signature obligations, renewals, and audits, providing a strong CLM solution without the complexity of large-scale enterprise systems.

Ratings

G2: 4.5
Capterra: 4.4

5) Juro

Juro is a modern, digital contract management platform renowned for its simplicity, speed, and intuitive design. It enables legal, sales, and operations teams to streamline the entire process from contract creation and negotiation to approval and collaboration ensuring faster turnaround times and smoother teamwork among the organization. Its flexible features make it suitable for businesses of all sizes looking to simplify contract workflows while maintaining control and compliance.

Key Features

Template library
Collaborative editing and negotiation inline.
Automated approval workflow
E-signature integration
Analytics and dashboards
Obligation & renewals tracking.
Central repository with versioning.
Integration with tools like CRM Salesforce etc and Slack

Why Choose Juro as Concord Alternative

For small to mid-sized teams seeking faster negotiation and approval processes. Ideal when complex enterprise customizations aren’t required but better collaboration and fewer manual handoffs are needed.

Ratings

G2: 4.6

Capterra: 4.8

6) Conga (Contracts)

Conga offers a suite of tools including Conga Contracts (CLM). Conga is a mature vendor, widely used in enterprises. It handles entire contract lifecycles, document generation, e-signature, compliance, and integrates heavily with customer-facing systems (CRM, ERP).

Key Features

Document generation
Complex approval workflows
Contract routing
E-signature
Analytics and dashboards
Renewal & amendment management
Version control.
Integration with CRM/ERP etc.
Compliance controls, audit trail and permissions.

Why Choose Conga as Concord Alternative

For teams needing extensive document generation, such as sales proposals and quotes. When Concord doesn’t offer certain dynamic document features or contract-assembly capabilities, Conga can provide a strong solution.

Ratings

G2: 4.2

Capterra: 4.3

7) Gatekeeper

Gatekeeper is a contract and supplier/vendor management solution. It combines contract lifecycle management with supplier risk and procurement/vendor management, making it especially strong where supplier relationships and compliance are as critical as contracts. Its centralized agreement repository helps teams streamline workflows, reduce risks, and maintain full visibility across all vendor interactions.

Key Features

Contract repository & lifecycle workflows
Vendor/supplier management
Compliance & audit trails
Alerts/reminders etc
eSignature
Centralized dashboards
Integration with procurement, financial and ERP system

Why Choose Gatekeeper as Concord Alternative

For businesses that heavily manage suppliers and vendors, requiring risk assessments, contract obligations, and supplier SLAs. Particularly suitable when procurement, legal, and other teams need to coordinate seamlessly within a single system.

Ratings

G2: 4.5

Capterra: 4.7

8) Summize

Summize is a modern contracting tool for contract review, negotiation, and lifecycle management. It helps accelerate process of contract negotiations, minimize manual redlining, enhance visibility into version changes, and simplify the signing process. Designed for teams looking to save time and improve collaboration, it makes managing contracts faster and more efficient.

Key Features

Version comparison
Redlining & tracking of changes between drafts.
Analytics around negotiation timelines / bottlenecks.
Repository of contracts.
Approvals & workflow orchestration.
eSignature or signature integrations.
Notifications, reminders.
Reporting and analytics dashboards.
Collaboration tools (comments, counterparty visibility).

Why Choose Summize as Concord Alternative

When negotiation or redlining speed is a challenge in Concord, and greater visibility into version changes along with better analytics is needed. Legal and operations teams can also reduce time spent merging changes and spotting differences.

Ratings

G2: 4.7
Capterra: 4.7

9) Sirion

Sirion (also known as SirionLabs) is a powerful solution for managing contracts after they are signed. It helps track obligations, monitor performance, manage vendors, and oversee risks throughout the life of an agreement. Designed for enterprises, it ensures that every contract is executed correctly, contracts obligations are fulfilled on time, and performance is measured accurately. By providing clear visibility into all contract-related activities, it helps teams stay on top of commitments and make informed decisions.

Key Features

Post-signature obligations
Counterparty performance analysis
Risk and compliance management
Contract repository and visibility
Renewals
Contract amendments
Agreement change management
Integrations with other enterprise systems
Audit trails

Why Choose Sirion as Concord Alternative

When the challenge extends beyond creating contracts to ensuring suppliers or vendors comply and performance is tracked after signing. This is especially important for tracking obligations, SLAs, vendor management, and monitoring risk over time, making it ideal for sectors like services, telecommunications, and healthcare.

Ratings

G2: 4.5

10) Agiloft

Agiloft is a highly reliable platform, designed to meet complex enterprise needs. It supports custom data models, flexible permissions, multiple workflows, and compliance requirements. For organizations that want to tailor many aspects of their contract management process, Agiloft offers a powerful contract management solution.

Key Features

Deep workflow customization
Role-based access
Contract authoring
Clause libraries.
E-signature options
Contract risk and obligation tracking
Integration with external systems ERP, CRM and API support
Audit trail
Version control
Contract compliance
Agreement renewal
Risk detection

Why Choose Agiloft as Concord Alternative

When contracts are highly complex, involving multiple stakeholders, exceptions, and regulatory or compliance requirements. This is especially relevant for organizations that need deep customization in workflows and data, or where Concord does not offer enough flexibility and control.

Ratings

G2: 4.6

Capterra: 4.8

Best Practices to Choose Alternative for Concord

Selecting the right alternative to Concord requires careful planning and understanding of organizational needs. Following best practices helps in choosing a solution that fits current operations and adapts to future demands, making contract management more organized and effective.

1. Define Specific Requirements Clearly

Choosing a best software for contract management begins with understanding exactly what the organisation needs. Knowing which features are essential and which are optional helps focus the evaluation and saves time. Clear requirements also guide decisions for future growth and avoid investing in unnecessary capabilities.

List the must-have features such as obligations tracking, AI risk analysis, or vendor management.
Identify nice-to-have features that add value but are not critical.
Rate features by importance to guide selection and prioritisation.

2. Consider Scale & Growth

A good Concord alternatives should not only meet current needs but also support future growth. As the number of contracts, users, and departments increases, the tool should handle additional workload without difficulty. Considering growth helps in avoiding frequent software changes and disruptions.

Estimate the number of contracts and users expected each year.
Assess how contract complexity may increase with business growth.
Choose a tool that can expand easily as demands rise.

3. Integration Needs

A good contract lifecycle management tool works best when it connects well with other systems in the organisation. Integration with existing system, document storage, and communication tools improves efficiency and avoids data gaps. Proper integration reduces manual work and allows smooth workflows across departments.

Check which systems need integration, such as CRM, ERP, and email.
Review data flow, API access, and single sign-on options.
Confirm that the tool can share information safely across platforms.

Recommended Read: Benefits of SharePoint Contract Management System

4. User Experience & Adoption

A tool with simple design and clear features encourages faster adoption across teams. When employees understand how to use it, the organisation benefits from better collaboration and consistent practices. Involving end users in testing helps pick a solution that fits daily work naturally.

Include end users from legal, operations, procurement, and sales in trials.
Evaluate training requirements and ease of use for all teams.
Test demos to check navigation, clarity, and user satisfaction.

5. Security, Compliance & Governance

Protecting contract data and following rules is crucial for every organisation. A concord alternatives that meets compliance standards and provides controlled access reduces risk and improves trust. Contract security features should match the sensitivity and regulatory requirements of the organisation.

Review audit trails and role-based access options.
Confirm compliance with GDPR or industry-specific regulations.
Check data encryption and advanced security features if needed.

6. Analytics & Visibility

Data from contracts can provide valuable insights for decision-making. A good contract management solution shows key metrics, tracks contract performance, and highlights areas for improvement. Reporting helps management plan better and track obligations and renewals.

Use dashboards to track contract cycle times and renewals.
Monitor bottlenecks or delays in the contract process.
Extract reports to gain insights, not just store contracts.

7. Vendor Support & Implementation Cost

Selecting a solution also involves evaluating support and the total investment. Efficient onboarding, training, and ongoing assistance improve adoption and reduce challenges. Comparing cost with the benefits and complexity ensures the solution is practical and sustainable.

Consider licensing, training, support, and customisation costs.
Review implementation time and how much support is offered.
Evaluate the total value compared to the investment.

8. Flexibility and Customisation

Organisations have unique processes, and a alternatives to Concord should adapt to them. Flexibility in workflows, templates, and fields allows teams to work in ways that suit their needs. Customisation options make it easier to manage different stages of contracts and special requirements.

Check for conditional workflows and custom document templates.
Look for tools that allow adding custom fields or labels.
Compare how easily the tool adapts to changing processes.

How to Deploy CLM 365

Review your current contract lifecycle stages and identify any bottlenecks or inefficiencies.
List the tools and platforms your team uses for drafting, approvals, and storage.
Activate CLM 365 and connect it to your Microsoft 365 account for seamless management.
Integrate with Outlook, MS Teams, SharePoint, MS Copilot, and the MS Word Plugin.
Use the AI agent to assist in drafting, suggest clauses, and reduce errors.
Set up automated approval workflows, role-based permissions, and real-time alerts.
Train your team using practical examples, quick guides, and AI agent support.
Track performance, measure efficiency improvements, and refine workflows regularly.

Conclusion

Concord is a strong CLM platform for many organisations, particularly those who want a full lifecycle tool with negotiation, authoring, signature, reminders etc. But as businesses grow and requirements change, it is wise to evaluate Concord alternatives that may offer better alignment with your internal systems, scale, pricing, or feature depth.

For organisations seeking advanced security, easy-to-use interfaces, AI-driven features, and cost-effective solutions, CLM 365 is an ideal choice to meet modern contract management needs.

Join Our Creative Community

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best Concord alternative for small businesses or startups?

For small teams or startups, tools like CLM 365, Zoho Contracts, Juro, or tend to offer good value and easier onboarding.

Can I migrate from Concord to another CLM tool easily?

It depends on the tool. Key migration concerns include exporting contracts (documents + metadata), mapping fields, recreating templates/clause libraries, migrating counterparties and obligation data. Some vendors provide migration support or services, plan data migration carefully.

How important is AI contract intelligence in choosing a Concord alternative?

AI features (clause risk detection, obligation extraction, automated redlining, analytics) can give big returns in large or complex contract environments. If your contracts have many clauses, negotiation cycles, risk exposure, then choosing a tool with strong AI might save time and reduce legal/financial risk.