Scattered Asset Records 
Different sites used a mix of spreadsheets, paper logs, and whiteboards to track assets, leading to frequent errors and inconsistent records. Without a centralized system, verifying asset status was difficult, and miscommunication between teams often caused double bookings and lost equipment 

Manual Audits and Check-ins 
Audits took weeks to complete due to manual asset counting, paper-based logs, and disconnected systems, often causing operational delays. Staff had to locate each item physically, which was both time-consuming and prone to error. Missing or outdated records frequently led to audit delays and compliance issues. 

Frequent Equipment Misplacement 
Without location tagging or ownership tracking, tools and machinery often went missing, leading to replacement costs and downtime. There was no way to trace who last used the equipment or where it was last seen. This lack of accountability resulted in frequent disputes and disrupted project timelines. 

Lack of Visibility Across Locations 
With no unified dashboard, the operations team couldn’t get a clear view of where assets were, how they were used, or when they were due for maintenance. Data was scattered across departments, making it hard to identify underused or missing assets. This limited visibility also hindered proactive maintenance planning and budget forecasting